User login
Registration closed
Manual registration is currently closed. If you want an account we can set one up for you. Just drop us an email. We’re working on re-opening manual registration very soon.
Recent Comments
- TWO new series! (58)
- Oh, bollocks (10)
- DwarfCast 25 - PipesCast (13)
- More On This New Series Malarkey (12)
- Dave Takes A Dip In The Car Pool (6)
- THE FIRST PAGE OF THE RED DWARF MOVIE SCRIPT? (19)
- SFX: Hunt The Covers! (52)
- John Hoare's Downfall... (33)
- Film Yourself Saying "Smeg", Win Prizes (29)
- DwarfCast 24 - Waiting for God Commentary (18)
Quick Links
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 11 guests online.Online users
Syndicate
Recommendations
Don’t worry - I’ll set that general media site up next week, for all these sorts of ramblings. But I just have to link to this Remembrance Of The Daleks review, which starts with the following assertation:
“Sylvester McCoy stars as the seventh and final Dr Who in this 1988 production. This production was a major event for fans of the programme as it marked the first appearance of the Daleks since the 1970’s.”
Erm, apart from Resurrection of the Daleks, of course. And, erm, Revelation of the Daleks - only three years earlier. Look, I don’t mind people getting obscure facts wrong so much. I can even put up with not-quite-so obscure facts being wrong. But please - if you’re going to write a review of something, is there any chance you could at least check the basic facts if you’re going to make assertations like that? All it takes is a quick look on any Who site on the net…
Anyway, after such a stupid mistake in the second sentence, I won’t bother with the rest of the review, I think. I’ll go and read something worth reading.